issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 470024896 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap · 7 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1500985062 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-1500985062 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Zdzbm | jdoblas 11092125 | 2023-04-08T21:58:27Z | 2023-04-08T21:58:27Z | NONE | very much in need of this one to able satellite image filtering across blocks |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 | |
| 1108212009 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-1108212009 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CDfkp | j2bbayle 3016805 | 2022-04-25T08:00:25Z | 2022-04-25T08:00:25Z | NONE | Indeed, this would be very useful in a great number of cases! |
{
"total_count": 3,
"+1": 3,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 | |
| 1100938882 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-1100938882 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Bnv6C | jakirkham 3019665 | 2022-04-17T19:44:03Z | 2022-04-17T19:44:03Z | NONE | Would be good to keep this open |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 | |
| 1100922143 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-1100922143 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Bnr0f | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2022-04-17T17:43:45Z | 2022-04-17T17:43:45Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 | |
| 668263428 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-668263428 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2ODI2MzQyOA== | jakirkham 3019665 | 2020-08-03T22:02:22Z | 2020-08-03T22:02:22Z | NONE | Yeah +1 for using |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 | |
| 513044413 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-513044413 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzA0NDQxMw== | jakirkham 3019665 | 2019-07-19T00:33:55Z | 2019-07-19T00:42:03Z | NONE | Another approach for the
While a little bit more cumbersome to write, this could be implemented with
If the slices are not strictly needed, this could be simplified a bit more.
Admittedly We could consider other things like making |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 | |
| 513029753 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3147#issuecomment-513029753 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3147 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzAyOTc1Mw== | jakirkham 3019665 | 2019-07-18T23:22:11Z | 2019-07-18T23:22:11Z | NONE | That sounds somewhat similar to |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implementing map_blocks and map_overlap 470024896 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4