issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 287969295 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

issue 1

  • Use apply_ufunc in xESMF regridding package · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
565857730 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1822#issuecomment-565857730 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1822 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NTg1NzczMA== stale[bot] 26384082 2019-12-15T23:19:50Z 2019-12-15T23:19:50Z NONE

In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity

If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the stale label; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Use apply_ufunc in xESMF regridding package 287969295
357549143 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1822#issuecomment-357549143 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1822 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1NzU0OTE0Mw== JiaweiZhuang 25473287 2018-01-14T22:44:15Z 2018-01-14T22:44:15Z NONE

I agree that they can be both implemented, and dask is useful for out-of-core. If anyone would like to contribute, please see JiaweiZhuang/xESMF#3 (comment) for my preliminary experiments with xr.apply_ufunc.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Use apply_ufunc in xESMF regridding package 287969295
357533707 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1822#issuecomment-357533707 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1822 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1NzUzMzcwNw== JiaweiZhuang 25473287 2018-01-14T19:05:29Z 2018-01-14T19:05:29Z NONE

Thanks for bringing this up... I've made more experiments and realized that Numba is actually faster than scipy.sparse, and also shows excellent parallel efficiency. See this notebook for all details. Thus I consider switch to Numba and add parallel support in the next version. It should fit better than xr.apply_ufunc in this case. Let's discuss in the original thread if you have further suggestions.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Use apply_ufunc in xESMF regridding package 287969295

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);