issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 264509098 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Improve documentation and error validation for set_options(arithmetic_join) · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1101015179 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1624#issuecomment-1101015179 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1624 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85BoCiL | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2022-04-18T01:43:46Z | 2022-04-18T01:43:46Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve documentation and error validation for set_options(arithmetic_join) 264509098 | |
652764200 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1624#issuecomment-652764200 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1Mjc2NDIwMA== | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2020-07-02T03:44:27Z | 2020-07-02T03:44:27Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve documentation and error validation for set_options(arithmetic_join) 264509098 | |
409774622 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1624#issuecomment-409774622 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTc3NDYyMg== | rmsare 3606852 | 2018-08-02T01:20:43Z | 2018-08-02T01:20:43Z | NONE | @shoyer Nice! Thanks for pointing it out, hadn't seen that PR. I like how the checks have been abstracted with validator functions, seems much more flexible overall. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve documentation and error validation for set_options(arithmetic_join) 264509098 | |
409755419 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1624#issuecomment-409755419 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTc1NTQxOQ== | rmsare 3606852 | 2018-08-01T23:14:18Z | 2018-08-01T23:14:18Z | NONE | This issue is pretty stale, but I've taken a crack at this. Not sure I like my approach. This doesn't seem like a high priority issue, but if we can triage my implementation with some feedback, happy to work it up into a PR. The idea was to add Both are called at the end of initialization to catch bad values before some function tries to use them in the new context. Does xarray have any established value checking practices? Skimming through the code I couldn't find any. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve documentation and error validation for set_options(arithmetic_join) 264509098 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2