home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "NONE", issue = 264049503 and user = 5225190 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • SeanDS · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • Rules for propagating attrs and encoding · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
398183428 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1614#issuecomment-398183428 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1614 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5ODE4MzQyOA== SeanDS 5225190 2018-06-18T20:23:41Z 2018-06-18T20:23:52Z NONE

are you referring to a different issue? the first post only summarizes some simple proposed rules.

No, just the proposed feature to keep or delete metadata based on the various operations. Is this behaviour already part of the library, and this issue is just to clarify the intended behaviour, or is this a feature proposal?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Rules for propagating attrs and encoding 264049503
397966050 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1614#issuecomment-397966050 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1614 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5Nzk2NjA1MA== SeanDS 5225190 2018-06-18T07:32:08Z 2018-06-18T07:32:08Z NONE

Also - might I suggest you consider some kind of history tracker as part of the metadata propagation? Perhaps metadata could be saved from each step of a set of operations, so that there is a full paper trail for the set of operations have been applied to the data. It could however get complicated to merge together objects with their own separate histories, especially if they ultimately descend from the same original data set.

This would be very relevant for scientific analyses.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Rules for propagating attrs and encoding 264049503
397965247 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1614#issuecomment-397965247 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1614 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5Nzk2NTI0Nw== SeanDS 5225190 2018-06-18T07:28:32Z 2018-06-18T07:28:32Z NONE

Hi, this feature would be very relevant to the intended use case of a project I'd like to use xarray for. Is the behaviour discussed in the first post implemented anywhere, e.g. in the trunk, for me to play with?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Rules for propagating attrs and encoding 264049503

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 13.46ms · About: xarray-datasette