home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

1 row where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 261403591 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • mmartini-usgs 1

issue 1

  • Need better user control of _FillValue attribute in NetCDF files · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
332942206 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1598#issuecomment-332942206 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1598 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMjk0MjIwNg== mmartini-usgs 23199378 2017-09-28T19:38:42Z 2017-09-28T19:38:42Z NONE

There is also the philosophical problem of fill values for coordinate variables. To be true to reality, one really would want to add an interpolated value that fills whatever gap or bad value exists. That seems to be out of the scope of xarray though.

I'm fine with a flag that controls only the coordinate data. That said, for the rest of the variables, we avoid NaN in _FillValue. We use 1E35. So there you could give the user a choice in default fill value. It seems pythonic to give the user flexibility. And the minute you satisfy us, there will be another use case that comes along with conflicting requirements. So you could use a flag and make it the user's choice, and not xarray's concern.

It also depends on where in the process one cleans up one's data - reduce first, then QA/QC, or QA/QC first, then reduce. We do both, it depends on the instrument.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Need better user control of _FillValue attribute in NetCDF files 261403591

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 12.504ms · About: xarray-datasette