issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "NONE", issue = 249188875 and user = 30219501 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Support for basic math (multiplication, difference) on two xarray-Datasets · 1 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
321474488 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1506#issuecomment-321474488 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1506 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyMTQ3NDQ4OA== | rpnaut 30219501 | 2017-08-10T07:31:35Z | 2017-08-10T07:31:35Z | NONE | A first check of your theory (shoyer) reveals that if the time stamps are exectly the same, i.e. the date and the time is equal for each time step in the two netcdf-files, then the operation is working sucessfully. I think it is very consequent to allow elementwise operations only on datasets with not only the same shape of dimensions and coordinates but also with the same values for dimensions, spatial coordinates and times. I only have to find a way to harmonize both datasets for time values prior operations with xarray ( a hard task considering model and evaluation data). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for basic math (multiplication, difference) on two xarray-Datasets 249188875 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1