issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 207862981 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

issue 1

  • BUG: Resample on PeriodIndex not working? · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
620700226 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1270#issuecomment-620700226 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1270 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyMDcwMDIyNg== stale[bot] 26384082 2020-04-28T16:04:19Z 2020-04-28T16:04:19Z NONE

In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity

If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the stale label; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   BUG: Resample on PeriodIndex not working? 207862981
392682701 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1270#issuecomment-392682701 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1270 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MjY4MjcwMQ== lvankampenhout 7933853 2018-05-29T07:41:53Z 2018-05-29T07:41:53Z NONE

thanks for your elaborate response @spencerkclark

Do you happen to be using a PeriodIndex because of pandas Timestamp-limitations?

Yes, the main limitation being the limited range of years (~584) whereas my dataset spans 1800 years. Note that in glaciology, which deals with ice sheet responses over multiple millennia, this is considered a short period.

I elaborated a bit more on my problem in this issue which is in a unofficial repo, I realized too late.

Anyway, your code using cftime solves my problem 😄 indeed resampling to 'AS-JUN' is what I was looking for. Still, it would be nice to have better support for PeriodIndex in the future. It has costed me a lot of time figuring out what's going on and learning the details of all the different date & time implementations. Which is a waste in the end. 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   BUG: Resample on PeriodIndex not working? 207862981
390892554 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1270#issuecomment-390892554 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1270 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDg5MjU1NA== lvankampenhout 7933853 2018-05-22T07:36:40Z 2018-05-22T07:36:40Z NONE

+1 to this issue. I'm struggling big time with an 1800-year climate model dataset that I need to resample in order to make different annual means (June-May).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   BUG: Resample on PeriodIndex not working? 207862981

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);