issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "NONE", issue = 1611288905 and user = 54963611 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- xr.where increase the bytes of the dataset · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1457723902 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7587#issuecomment-1457723902 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7587 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W4xn- | OttavioM 54963611 | 2023-03-07T08:05:01Z | 2023-03-07T08:05:01Z | NONE | Thank you, Next time I will triple check and exclude those variables from being expanded in dimension. Thank you for your time. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.where increase the bytes of the dataset 1611288905 | |
1457131609 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7587#issuecomment-1457131609 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7587 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W2hBZ | OttavioM 54963611 | 2023-03-06T22:35:50Z | 2023-03-06T22:38:01Z | NONE | Dear Slevang, Thank you very much for your reply, I was indeed trying the same without the
The two datasets ( There is a solution? Thank you a lot, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.where increase the bytes of the dataset 1611288905 | |
1456417836 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7587#issuecomment-1456417836 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7587 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Wzyws | OttavioM 54963611 | 2023-03-06T16:07:00Z | 2023-03-06T16:07:00Z | NONE | Thank you so much for your very quick reply, The files are This is the I double-checked the data and they seem to be float64. As you said, they do not change dtype and using only a variable, this is the result:
So using only one variable the problem disappears.
I checked all the variables, the problem exists only when using the whole dataset. Do you have any suggestion? Thank you, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.where increase the bytes of the dataset 1611288905 | |
1456097975 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7587#issuecomment-1456097975 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7587 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Wykq3 | OttavioM 54963611 | 2023-03-06T13:05:34Z | 2023-03-06T13:12:20Z | NONE | Thank you very much for your fast reply,
Thank you, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.where increase the bytes of the dataset 1611288905 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1