issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 1575494367 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Aesara as an array backend in Xarray · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1423274243 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7515#issuecomment-1423274243 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7515 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85U1XED | brandonwillard 971601 | 2023-02-08T21:39:47Z | 2023-02-08T21:39:47Z | NONE |
We'll fix the compatibility issues, but we first need to understand what the expectations on something like For a shared variable, it's always possible to get a value for |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Aesara as an array backend in Xarray 1575494367 | |
1422995401 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7515#issuecomment-1422995401 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7515 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85U0S_J | rlouf 3885044 | 2023-02-08T17:35:41Z | 2023-02-08T17:35:41Z | NONE | Aesara has a NumPy-like API, and we always planned to conform to the python array api standard (see https://github.com/aesara-devs/aesara/issues/729 for instance). This would be the impetus for us to do it now. |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Aesara as an array backend in Xarray 1575494367 | |
1422043601 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7515#issuecomment-1422043601 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7515 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UwqnR | brandonwillard 971601 | 2023-02-08T05:36:53Z | 2023-02-08T06:32:37Z | NONE |
Hi, I'm the creator and maintainer of Aesara and we are interested in discussing named dimensions and arrays. We don't know why @twiecki and his PyMC Labs group have been attempting to implicitly speak for us on this—or any other—matter. As you can see, the original issue in Aesara is still open, and we have not said that the feature cannot be implemented in some way. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Aesara as an array backend in Xarray 1575494367 | |
1422075564 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7515#issuecomment-1422075564 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7515 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Uwyas | rlouf 3885044 | 2023-02-08T06:18:38Z | 2023-02-08T06:29:26Z | NONE | Author of the little diagram and core member of Aesara here 🙂 If you want to know a little more about where the project is headed you can consult the project’s Mission statement. Happy to chat, you can find my contact info on my GitHub profile, and/or join our new Discord server. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Aesara as an array backend in Xarray 1575494367 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2