home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "NONE", issue = 145140657 and user = 917914 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • rhattersley · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • xarray to and from iris · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
218735368 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/814#issuecomment-218735368 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/814 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxODczNTM2OA== rhattersley 917914 2016-05-12T11:53:54Z 2016-05-12T11:53:59Z NONE

There's been a question over whether parse_cell_methods should really have the cf_var_name argument. It's only used if it raises a warning, and even then it's only used to help make the message more user friendly. In itself that doesn't seem like a big deal, but it did make me wonder if you'd rather if it didn't raise the warning at all?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  xarray to and from iris 145140657
205286718 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/814#issuecomment-205286718 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/814 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNTI4NjcxOA== rhattersley 917914 2016-04-04T13:00:04Z 2016-04-04T13:00:04Z NONE

Uses the same template as the cdms2 conversion.

If this is the way to do things then does this comment need deleting?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  xarray to and from iris 145140657
205261854 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/814#issuecomment-205261854 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/814 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNTI2MTg1NA== rhattersley 917914 2016-04-04T11:49:23Z 2016-04-04T11:49:23Z NONE

What do people think about keeping or dropping the automatic dimension coordinates that xarray creates?

Is there any way to know for sure whether a coordinate has been automatically created? Or is the name the only clue?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  xarray to and from iris 145140657

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 11.708ms · About: xarray-datasette