issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 1076265104 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Weighted quantile · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1022419678 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1022419678 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8488OLe | seberg 61977 | 2022-01-26T17:22:40Z | 2022-01-26T17:49:18Z | NONE | We discussed this in the Triage meeting a bit, and settled on "we want this". We are OK with the sorting approach and limiting e.g. only to EDIT: Oops, meant to post on the NumPy PR, but OK here as well, I guess ;) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 | |
1005181858 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6059#issuecomment-1005181858 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6059 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8476dui | dgilford 8387331 | 2022-01-04T21:25:38Z | 2022-01-04T21:25:38Z | NONE | Many thanks for calling this to my attention (via #5870)! Following. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 1076265104 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2