issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 822256201 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add date attribute to datetime accessor · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
800120025 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4994#issuecomment-800120025 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4994 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMDEyMDAyNQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-03-16T10:00:37Z | 2021-03-16T10:00:37Z | MEMBER | Thanks @observingClouds! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add date attribute to datetime accessor 822256201 | |
796914880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4994#issuecomment-796914880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4994 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5NjkxNDg4MA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-03-11T17:38:39Z | 2021-03-11T17:38:39Z | MEMBER | Hi @observingClouds — thanks for the PR, and forgive us taking a few days to review it. Without me being an expert in this area, it looks good. Could you add a test for the behavior? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add date attribute to datetime accessor 822256201 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2