issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 819911891 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Adds Dataset.query() method, analogous to pandas DataFrame.query() · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
800461714 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4984#issuecomment-800461714 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4984 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMDQ2MTcxNA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-03-16T17:28:11Z | 2021-03-16T17:28:11Z | MEMBER | Great, merging! Seconded re the docs! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adds Dataset.query() method, analogous to pandas DataFrame.query() 819911891 | |
800308560 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4984#issuecomment-800308560 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4984 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMDMwODU2MA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-03-16T14:30:40Z | 2021-03-16T14:30:40Z | MEMBER | Excellent! Could we add a very small test for the DataArray? Given the coverage on Dataset, it should mostly just test that the method works. Any thoughts from others before we merge? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adds Dataset.query() method, analogous to pandas DataFrame.query() 819911891 | |
799076455 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4984#issuecomment-799076455 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4984 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5OTA3NjQ1NQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-03-15T04:13:46Z | 2021-03-15T04:13:46Z | MEMBER | Great re the dimensions! I reviewed the tests more fully, they look great. It looks like we need a Could we add a simple method to And we should add the methods to Does anyone have any other thoughts? I think the API is very reasonable. I could imagine a more sophisticated API that could take a single query, rather than a dict of them by dimension — currently it's |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adds Dataset.query() method, analogous to pandas DataFrame.query() 819911891 | |
797842181 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4984#issuecomment-797842181 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4984 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5Nzg0MjE4MQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-03-13T01:27:32Z | 2021-03-13T01:27:32Z | MEMBER |
For sure — forgive me if I wasn't clear. Currently the test runs over an array of two dimensions — |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Adds Dataset.query() method, analogous to pandas DataFrame.query() 819911891 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1