home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

7 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 819003369 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

  • dcherian 5
  • mathause 1
  • andersy005 1

issue 1

  • Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling · 7 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 7 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
802131062 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-802131062 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMjEzMTA2Mg== dcherian 2448579 2021-03-18T17:10:28Z 2021-03-18T17:10:28Z MEMBER

thanks @andersy005 !

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369
802123636 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-802123636 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMjEyMzYzNg== andersy005 13301940 2021-03-18T17:06:46Z 2021-03-18T17:06:46Z MEMBER

@dcherian, should we test this in upstream-dev CI workflow (via the [test-upstream] keyword)?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369
802112978 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-802112978 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMjExMjk3OA== dcherian 2448579 2021-03-18T17:01:34Z 2021-03-18T17:01:34Z MEMBER

You don't import sliding_window_view from dask.

haha. fixed!

I was waiting on that PR to see if the reviews would catch any bugs.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369
802102704 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-802102704 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMjEwMjcwNA== mathause 10194086 2021-03-18T16:47:52Z 2021-03-18T16:48:14Z MEMBER

It looked pretty good when I reviewed it, so :+1:

Just quickly skimming the code it did not become entirely clear to me why this had to be after dask/dask#7234? You don't import sliding_window_view from dask. Also you re-define sliding_window_view in dask_array_compat.py - why don't you need this in dask proper? (Not complaining just wondering. Also feel free to not answer the question if you don't have time.)

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369
802084481 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-802084481 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMjA4NDQ4MQ== dcherian 2448579 2021-03-18T16:31:13Z 2021-03-18T16:31:13Z MEMBER

The dask PR was merged so this should be ready to go.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369
798782767 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-798782767 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5ODc4Mjc2Nw== dcherian 2448579 2021-03-13T20:43:43Z 2021-03-13T20:44:14Z MEMBER

I am still interested to eventually fix #2007. This PR may also make that easier as it now uses Variable.pad.

That's the goal i.e. make it easier to fix #2007 and minimize number of code paths for rolling. This PR reduces the number of places we call pad from 4 to 3 :P. The two bottleneck code paths still do their own padding.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369
788271567 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4977#issuecomment-788271567 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4977 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4ODI3MTU2Nw== dcherian 2448579 2021-03-01T20:54:36Z 2021-03-01T20:54:36Z MEMBER

sliding_window_view dispatches with array_function so we could support other duck array libraries if they implemented it. cc @keewis

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Use numpy & dask sliding_window_view for rolling 819003369

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 3762.345ms · About: xarray-datasette