issue_comments

Table actions

6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 773945564 and user = 13301940 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • andersy005 · 6 ✖

issue 1

  • Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions · 6 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 6 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
763228697 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-763228697 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MzIyODY5Nw== andersy005 13301940 2021-01-20T00:04:43Z 2021-01-20T00:04:43Z MEMBER

The "Overriding CI behaviors" is fairly prominent in the PR template, when I wouldn't expect it to be used that often. Was that intended? Should it be a markdown comment?

The current choice was just a first stab at documenting the CI "special" behaviors.

👍🏽 to making the "overriding CI behaviors" section a markdown comment and documenting this in the contributing guide (for convenience) if need be. 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions 773945564
756310857 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756310857 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjMxMDg1Nw== andersy005 13301940 2021-01-07T18:53:48Z 2021-01-07T18:53:48Z MEMBER

Heres' what we get with [skip-ci] tag in the git commit message: Cc @dcherian 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions 773945564
756291965 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756291965 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjI5MTk2NQ== andersy005 13301940 2021-01-07T18:20:47Z 2021-01-07T18:20:47Z MEMBER

@andersy005 - I merged #4688, so we just have some conflicts to sort out now.

I'm working on it. Will update this branch shortly

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions 773945564
756248053 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756248053 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjI0ODA1Mw== andersy005 13301940 2021-01-07T17:06:54Z 2021-01-07T17:06:54Z MEMBER

should we do skip-ci in a different PR?

I can take care of this in this PR.

Please remind me... Is the objective here to disable all CIs when [skip-ci] is present in the git commit message?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions 773945564
756243970 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756243970 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjI0Mzk3MA== andersy005 13301940 2021-01-07T17:01:43Z 2021-01-07T17:01:43Z MEMBER

@andersy005 - what do you think about just removing 3.6 from the test matrix for now? #4720 will go in soon.

👍🏽 Makes sense.... Done!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions 773945564
754958057 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-754958057 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDk1ODA1Nw== andersy005 13301940 2021-01-05T23:14:00Z 2021-01-05T23:18:48Z MEMBER

The pre-commit/action failure appears to be connected to https://github.com/pre-commit/action/issues/53. ~~I don't know how to address the issue yet...~~

Update: Restarting the workflow run fixes it 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Migrate CI from azure pipelines to GitHub Actions 773945564

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);