issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 748264086 and user = 14808389 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- clean up upstream-dev CI · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
732331278 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4599#issuecomment-732331278 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4599 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMjMzMTI3OA== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-11-23T18:05:31Z | 2020-11-23T18:11:49Z | MEMBER | That's somewhat different, I think. Branch protection defines CI that has to pass in order to be able to merge the PR, while allowed failures change the result of the CI. For the current implementation of this, see the changes in #4584. Edit: the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
clean up upstream-dev CI 748264086 | |
732284031 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4599#issuecomment-732284031 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4599 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMjI4NDAzMQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-11-23T16:47:46Z | 2020-11-23T16:47:46Z | MEMBER | If I remember correctly, we decided to mark the upstream-dev CI as allowed failure. If there's a way to mark the PR CI as such, I think the only benefit is that a allowed failure of the old azure CI is a bit more visible (see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4584#issuecomment-729726028). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
clean up upstream-dev CI 748264086 | |
732275375 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4599#issuecomment-732275375 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4599 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMjI3NTM3NQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-11-23T16:33:19Z | 2020-11-23T16:33:19Z | MEMBER | great, thanks again, @andersy005. Let's merge now and leave the choice between the old and new PR CI to a different PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
clean up upstream-dev CI 748264086 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1