issue_comments
4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 735523592 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Cannot plot multiindexed (stacked) coordinate as hue variable · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
929295038 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4562#issuecomment-929295038 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4562 | IC_kwDOAMm_X843Y-q- | benbovy 4160723 | 2021-09-28T14:39:43Z | 2021-09-28T14:39:43Z | MEMBER | Note that we're planning to depreciate multi-index dimension (tuple) coordinates and keep only the multi-index levels as coordinates. The main reason is that this will better fit within Xarray's (forthcoming) updated data model with explicit indexes (so far we kept those tuple coordinates to make multi-index work with the concept of a "dimension" index coordinate, but this will no longer be necessary). I see how convenient it is here to use those tuple coordinates as hue (legend) labels to show the value combinations, but there must be other ways to do that. For example, you could simply assign a new coordinate to the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Cannot plot multiindexed (stacked) coordinate as hue variable 735523592 | |
729275558 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4562#issuecomment-729275558 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4562 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTI3NTU1OA== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-11-17T23:27:47Z | 2020-11-17T23:27:47Z | MEMBER | You have to specify |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Cannot plot multiindexed (stacked) coordinate as hue variable 735523592 | |
721855875 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4562#issuecomment-721855875 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4562 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMTg1NTg3NQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-11-04T17:04:28Z | 2020-11-04T17:04:28Z | MEMBER | Yes seems a sems like a sensible approach. Maybe you can use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Cannot plot multiindexed (stacked) coordinate as hue variable 735523592 | |
721348538 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4562#issuecomment-721348538 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4562 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMTM0ODUzOA== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-11-03T20:06:33Z | 2020-11-03T20:06:33Z | MEMBER | That might be my doing here: #3938 It makes sense to allow a MultiIndex as a label but probably not as a coordinate. So this may need some thinking. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Cannot plot multiindexed (stacked) coordinate as hue variable 735523592 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2