issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 626083981 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
These facets timed out: author_association, issue
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
803443559 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-803443559 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMzQ0MzU1OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2021-03-20T18:45:59Z | 2021-03-20T18:45:59Z | MEMBER | I suspect we could make Pooch work OK by tagging releases in the xarray-data repository. Then we can manually update the version number inside xarray whenever we add or update a dataset. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
803440144 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-803440144 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMzQ0MDE0NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2021-03-20T18:29:55Z | 2021-03-20T18:29:55Z | MEMBER | I don't think it's important to preserve the GitHub URL and branch options. I suspect those options exist strictly for testing new datasets. I'm surprised that Pooch seems to be focused on data that is bundled in code repositories. It seems like that could easily lead to bloated repositories (though I guess xarray data is bigger than image data, for example). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
651510424 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-651510424 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTUxMDQyNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-06-30T03:43:47Z | 2020-06-30T03:43:47Z | MEMBER |
Let's skip this module for mypy. You can add it to the list in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
651224155 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-651224155 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTIyNDE1NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-06-29T16:21:29Z | 2020-06-29T16:21:29Z | MEMBER |
As mentioned in that issue, we could definitely vendor a copy of appdirs if desired. Or we could pick some simple heuristic. In practice I think |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 | |
650942527 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4102#issuecomment-650942527 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4102 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MDk0MjUyNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-06-29T06:11:18Z | 2020-06-29T06:11:18Z | MEMBER |
I would suggest just creating the full directory tree, e.g., with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cache rasterio example files 626083981 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1