issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 550335922 and user = 10050469 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date)

user 1

  • fmaussion · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • documentation build issues on RTD · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
590925187 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-590925187 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MDkyNTE4Nw== fmaussion 10050469 2020-02-25T15:30:39Z 2020-02-25T15:30:39Z MEMBER

Is there a downside to this?

Wouldn't we loose the possibility explore older version of the docs? Or is doctr also providing this service?

It seems so silly to have to reivent readthedocs just because of their CI...

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   documentation build issues on RTD 550335922

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);