home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 550335922 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 5

  • keewis 3
  • crusaderky 2
  • rabernat 1
  • dcherian 1
  • fmaussion 1

issue 1

  • documentation build issues on RTD · 8 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 8 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
782938240 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-782938240 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MjkzODI0MA== keewis 14808389 2021-02-21T22:21:55Z 2021-02-25T13:52:03Z MEMBER

we didn't see this for quite some time, so I assume we can close this.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
590925187 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-590925187 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MDkyNTE4Nw== fmaussion 10050469 2020-02-25T15:30:39Z 2020-02-25T15:30:39Z MEMBER

Is there a downside to this?

Wouldn't we loose the possibility explore older version of the docs? Or is doctr also providing this service?

It seems so silly to have to reivent readthedocs just because of their CI...

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
579397908 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-579397908 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3OTM5NzkwOA== keewis 14808389 2020-01-28T18:49:17Z 2020-01-28T22:42:50Z MEMBER

it may be that the timeouts are not caused by RTD: I have been trying to build the documentation several times and it sometimes pauses while trying to read / build (?) dask.rst. This is the traceback if I cause a KeyboardInterrupt:

```pytb KeyboardInterrupt Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-4-2ef53683336b> in <module> ----> 1 ds.to_netcdf('manipulated-example-data.nc') .../xarray/core/dataset.py in to_netcdf(self, path, mode, format, group, engine, encoding, unlimited_dims, compute, invalid_netcdf) 1543 unlimited_dims=unlimited_dims, 1544 compute=compute, -> 1545 invalid_netcdf=invalid_netcdf, 1546 ) 1547 .../xarray/backends/api.py in to_netcdf(dataset, path_or_file, mode, format, group, engine, encoding, unlimited_dims, compute, multifile, invalid_netcdf) 1095 return writer, store 1096 -> 1097 writes = writer.sync(compute=compute) 1098 1099 if path_or_file is None: .../xarray/backends/common.py in sync(self, compute) 202 compute=compute, 203 flush=True, --> 204 regions=self.regions, 205 ) 206 self.sources = [] .../lib/python3.7/site-packages/dask/array/core.py in store(sources, targets, lock, regions, compute, return_stored, **kwargs) 921 922 if compute: --> 923 result.compute(**kwargs) 924 return None 925 else: .../lib/python3.7/site-packages/dask/base.py in compute(self, **kwargs) 163 dask.base.compute 164 """ --> 165 (result,) = compute(self, traverse=False, **kwargs) 166 return result 167 .../lib/python3.7/site-packages/dask/base.py in compute(*args, **kwargs) 434 keys = [x.__dask_keys__() for x in collections] 435 postcomputes = [x.__dask_postcompute__() for x in collections] --> 436 results = schedule(dsk, keys, **kwargs) 437 return repack([f(r, *a) for r, (f, a) in zip(results, postcomputes)]) 438 .../lib/python3.7/site-packages/dask/threaded.py in get(dsk, result, cache, num_workers, pool, **kwargs) 79 get_id=_thread_get_id, 80 pack_exception=pack_exception, ---> 81 **kwargs 82 ) 83 .../lib/python3.7/site-packages/dask/local.py in get_async(apply_async, num_workers, dsk, result, cache, get_id, rerun_exceptions_locally, pack_exception, raise_exception, callbacks, dumps, loads, **kwargs) 473 # Main loop, wait on tasks to finish, insert new ones 474 while state["waiting"] or state["ready"] or state["running"]: --> 475 key, res_info, failed = queue_get(queue) 476 if failed: 477 exc, tb = loads(res_info) .../lib/python3.7/site-packages/dask/local.py in queue_get(q) 131 132 def queue_get(q): --> 133 return q.get() 134 135 .../lib/python3.7/queue.py in get(self, block, timeout) 168 elif timeout is None: 169 while not self._qsize(): --> 170 self.not_empty.wait() 171 elif timeout < 0: 172 raise ValueError("'timeout' must be a non-negative number") .../lib/python3.7/threading.py in wait(self, timeout) 294 try: # restore state no matter what (e.g., KeyboardInterrupt) 295 if timeout is None: --> 296 waiter.acquire() 297 gotit = True 298 else: KeyboardInterrupt: ```

Is there something that could cause a dead lock?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
579420906 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-579420906 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3OTQyMDkwNg== dcherian 2448579 2020-01-28T19:42:43Z 2020-01-28T19:42:43Z MEMBER

Yeah I run into this occasionally.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
577197732 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-577197732 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NzE5NzczMg== crusaderky 6213168 2020-01-22T14:08:20Z 2020-01-22T14:08:20Z MEMBER

The obvious downside is that anybody with a link to one of the internal pages of our documentation will have the link broken. Also I'm unsure how straightforward it will be to rebuild all of our historical versions.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
577197322 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-577197322 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NzE5NzMyMg== crusaderky 6213168 2020-01-22T14:07:25Z 2020-01-22T14:07:25Z MEMBER

Very glad to upvote anything that rids us of the RTD CI!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
574847265 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-574847265 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NDg0NzI2NQ== keewis 14808389 2020-01-15T20:42:11Z 2020-01-15T20:42:11Z MEMBER

not sure on downsides, but I think we could use this to provide a documentation preview for PRs?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922
574837235 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3697#issuecomment-574837235 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3697 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NDgzNzIzNQ== rabernat 1197350 2020-01-15T20:15:17Z 2020-01-15T20:15:17Z MEMBER

Many projects have moved away from RTD for this reason. We can easily build the docs in travis and then use doctr to deploy them.

Is there a downside to this?

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  documentation build issues on RTD 550335922

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 720.845ms · About: xarray-datasette