issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 522523336 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add DatasetGroupBy.quantile · 1 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
554498852 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3527#issuecomment-554498852 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3527 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NDQ5ODg1Mg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-11-15T19:36:50Z | 2019-11-15T19:36:50Z | MEMBER | Dimension reordering has come up a few times before (https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1739, and others that I can't immediately find) I think we should probably have a general solution & standard behavior here. Others should weigh in (CC @shoyer), but I would vote to not worry too much about it here, and prioritize simplicity and consistency with past behavior until we decide on a more general solution. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add DatasetGroupBy.quantile 522523336 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1