home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 522519084 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

  • rabernat 1
  • jhamman 1
  • dcherian 1

issue 1

  • Allow nested dictionaries in the Zarr backend (#3517) · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1410658476 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3526#issuecomment-1410658476 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3526 IC_kwDOAMm_X85UFPCs jhamman 2443309 2023-01-31T16:08:36Z 2023-01-31T16:08:36Z MEMBER

Bring back this old issue since I think there is value in getting something like this in. My suggestion would be to write a zarr-specific _validate_attrs function and use that, rather than stubbing in a special case for zarr in the generic one. @eddienko , I know this has sat for a long time but would you like to try to finish this up?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Allow nested dictionaries in the Zarr backend (#3517) 522519084
554479941 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3526#issuecomment-554479941 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3526 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NDQ3OTk0MQ== dcherian 2448579 2019-11-15T18:41:43Z 2019-11-15T18:41:43Z MEMBER

Whatever value is given then gets serialised using the built-in json.dumps. This means I believe that if someone provides a dict as an attribute value then that will get serialised as a JSON object,

@eddienko I think this means we can avoid converting to a list?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Allow nested dictionaries in the Zarr backend (#3517) 522519084
553995368 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3526#issuecomment-553995368 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3526 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1Mzk5NTM2OA== rabernat 1197350 2019-11-14T17:34:06Z 2019-11-14T17:34:06Z MEMBER

I am slammed right now with a proposal and can't really spend time on this, so I'll tag @jakirkham and @alimanfoo who can provide a zarr perspective on what is going on here.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Allow nested dictionaries in the Zarr backend (#3517) 522519084

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 14.126ms · About: xarray-datasette