issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 499477363 and user = 1197350 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • rabernat · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • Implement polyfit? · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
537563405 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3349#issuecomment-537563405 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3349 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNzU2MzQwNQ== rabernat 1197350 2019-10-02T16:04:02Z 2019-10-02T16:06:20Z MEMBER

I'm getting deja-vu here... Xscale has a huge and impressive sounding API. But no code coverage and no commits since January. Like many of these projects, it seems to have bit off more than its maintainers could chew.

Edit: I'd love for such a package to really achieve community uptake and become sustainable. I just don't quite know the roadmap for getting there.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Implement polyfit? 499477363
536670564 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3349#issuecomment-536670564 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3349 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNjY3MDU2NA== rabernat 1197350 2019-09-30T17:42:57Z 2019-09-30T17:42:57Z MEMBER

Now that xarray itself has interpolate, gradient, and integrate, it seems like the only thing left in xr-scipy is fourier transforms, which is also what we provide in xrft! 😆 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Implement polyfit? 499477363
536654572 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3349#issuecomment-536654572 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3349 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNjY1NDU3Mg== rabernat 1197350 2019-09-30T17:01:57Z 2019-09-30T17:01:57Z MEMBER

The question of a standalone library has come up many times (see discussion in #1850). Everyone agrees it's a nice idea, but no one seems to have the bandwidth to take on ownership and maintenance of such a project.

Perhaps we need to put this issue on pause and figure out a general strategy here. The current Xarray API is far from a complete feature set, so more development is needed. But we should decide what belongs in xarray and what belongs elsewhere. #1850 is probably the best place to continue that conversation.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Implement polyfit? 499477363

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);