home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 480786385 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

  • max-sixty 2
  • shoyer 1

issue 1

  • merge_asof functionality · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
521411228 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3218#issuecomment-521411228 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3218 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMTQxMTIyOA== max-sixty 5635139 2019-08-14T20:43:57Z 2019-08-14T20:43:57Z MEMBER

How is merge_asof different from using reindex with method='pad'?

Yes this is right! Mea culpa. We can already use the pandas reindexing for the 1D case (which should cover your case @fjanoos ?)

@fjanoos can you confirm this is what you're looking for?

```python

In [4]: da=xr.DataArray(list('abcdefghil'), dims=['x'],coords=dict(x=range(10)))

In [8]: da.reindex(x=[0,2.5,2.6,2.7,5,6.2], method='nearest') Out[8]: <xarray.DataArray (x: 6)> array(['a', 'd', 'd', 'd', 'f', 'g'], dtype='<U1') Coordinates: * x (x) float64 0.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 5.0 6.2

```

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  merge_asof functionality 480786385
521387096 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3218#issuecomment-521387096 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3218 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMTM4NzA5Ng== shoyer 1217238 2019-08-14T19:34:22Z 2019-08-14T19:34:22Z MEMBER

How is merge_asof different from using reindex with method='pad'?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  merge_asof functionality 480786385
521357519 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3218#issuecomment-521357519 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3218 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMTM1NzUxOQ== max-sixty 5635139 2019-08-14T18:12:43Z 2019-08-14T18:12:43Z MEMBER

I think this would be good. It would need to be implemented outside of python (cython / numba / etc) given the performance requirements. I'm not sure whether we could borrow the pandas functionality and apply it to multi-dimensional arrays.

Assuming we'd need to write our own, xarray doesn't have any cython dependencies, so I think it would be best in a separate and optional package. These could go in numbagg. It's non-trivial work, so someone would have to have a strong need for it.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  merge_asof functionality 480786385

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1120.504ms · About: xarray-datasette