issue_comments

Table actions

9 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 411738552 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

issue 1

  • 0.12.0 release · 9 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 9 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
473608258 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-473608258 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MzYwODI1OA== jhamman 2443309 2019-03-17T01:51:54Z 2019-03-17T01:51:54Z MEMBER

Thanks @shoyer. I merged the conda-forge build about an hour ago. 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
473497756 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-473497756 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MzQ5Nzc1Ng== shoyer 1217238 2019-03-16T04:18:21Z 2019-03-16T04:18:21Z MEMBER

I finally tagged the 0.12 release... probably should have done this a while ago!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
472935226 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-472935226 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjkzNTIyNg== shoyer 1217238 2019-03-14T16:01:20Z 2019-03-14T16:01:20Z MEMBER

Any objections to pushing back finalizing deprecations currently marked for 0.12? See https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2809

I'm a little concerned that most of these changes (introduced in 0.11) haven't been around long enough to safely finalize the deprecations.

 
{
    "total_count": 4,
    "+1": 4,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
472141434 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-472141434 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjE0MTQzNA== max-sixty 5635139 2019-03-12T19:10:17Z 2019-03-12T19:10:17Z MEMBER

(I have let some of my PRs stay almost-finished. I will endeavor to follow my own advice and complete soon. Thanks for everyone's patience)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
472137257 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-472137257 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjEzNzI1Nw== shoyer 1217238 2019-03-12T18:58:13Z 2019-03-12T18:58:13Z MEMBER

I guess we should probably fix and/or remove the failing test in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2803, too.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
472136793 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-472136793 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjEzNjc5Mw== shoyer 1217238 2019-03-12T18:56:54Z 2019-03-12T18:56:54Z MEMBER

I'm going to cherry-pick https://github.com/pydata/xarray/commit/63da214d697345ebdd0ecc0967c72eafc70bcb0d and then try to get a release out.

We can start the deprecation cycle for auto-combine later.

 
{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 2,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
467492121 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-467492121 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NzQ5MjEyMQ== TomNicholas 35968931 2019-02-26T15:49:15Z 2019-02-26T15:49:15Z MEMBER

Potentially completing #2616 would start the deprecation cycle for auto_combine etc? I would need at least a few days to do that though...

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
465270295 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-465270295 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTI3MDI5NQ== spencerkclark 6628425 2019-02-19T19:12:54Z 2019-02-19T19:12:54Z MEMBER

I think #2721 looks ready too, and @jwenfai and @tlogan2000 would probably appreciate it if we merged it in time for the 0.12 release (sorry for letting that sit for a couple weeks). 

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 1,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552
464995425 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2776#issuecomment-464995425 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2776 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NDk5NTQyNQ== dcherian 2448579 2019-02-19T05:56:58Z 2019-02-19T05:56:58Z MEMBER

2759 looks ready and complements all the cftime stuff.

2769 seems like a nice bugfix to merge.

Otherwise lgtm.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   0.12.0 release 411738552

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);