issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 403504120 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Should xarray.align sort indexes in alignment? · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
458237502 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2719#issuecomment-458237502 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2719 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1ODIzNzUwMg== shoyer 1217238 2019-01-28T18:03:53Z 2019-01-28T18:03:53Z MEMBER

We may not need to change this in xarray after all -- its seems that the upstream consensus is that alignment operations shouldn't sort by default, and the breaking change in pandas 0.24.x is going to be reverted (see https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/24959).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Should xarray.align sort indexes in alignment? 403504120

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);