issue_comments

Table actions

5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 391477755 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • shoyer · 5 ✖

issue 1

  • Added Coarsen · 5 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 5 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
451726877 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-451726877 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MTcyNjg3Nw== shoyer 1217238 2019-01-06T09:13:56Z 2019-01-06T09:13:56Z MEMBER

Indeed, thank you @fujiisoup !

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Added Coarsen 391477755
451350667 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-451350667 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MTM1MDY2Nw== shoyer 1217238 2019-01-04T04:22:18Z 2019-01-04T04:22:18Z MEMBER

I plan to merge this tomorrow unless anyone else has further suggestions.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Added Coarsen 391477755
449214046 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-449214046 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTIxNDA0Ng== shoyer 1217238 2018-12-21T02:00:53Z 2018-12-21T02:00:53Z MEMBER

@pydata/xarray any opinions on what the default value for the boundary argument to coarsen() should be?

Personally, I like boundary='exact', but I also work mostly with simulated data with dimensions setup to be exact powers of 2 :). 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Added Coarsen 391477755
448721612 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-448721612 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0ODcyMTYxMg== shoyer 1217238 2018-12-19T19:48:02Z 2018-12-19T19:48:02Z MEMBER

I do think it would be nice for resample() to work with numbers and along multiple dimensions, but that's definitely a bigger project.

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Added Coarsen 391477755
448718248 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2612#issuecomment-448718248 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2612 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0ODcxODI0OA== shoyer 1217238 2018-12-19T19:37:09Z 2018-12-19T19:37:09Z MEMBER

@max-sixty we discussed this a little bit: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2525#issuecomment-434477550

The main difference is that resample is coordinate based, whereas this is integer position based which makes the implementation considerably simpler.

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Added Coarsen 391477755

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);