issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 384004189 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- CF: also decode time bounds when available · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
446661848 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2571#issuecomment-446661848 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2571 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NjY2MTg0OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-12-12T16:58:11Z | 2018-12-12T16:58:11Z | MEMBER | +1 for putting this in "Breaking changes" (we try to be pretty conservative with the definition of a strict "Enhancement"), but otherwise this looks good to me. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF: also decode time bounds when available 384004189 | |
441412776 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2571#issuecomment-441412776 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2571 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MTQxMjc3Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-11-25T03:34:46Z | 2018-11-25T03:34:46Z | MEMBER | Could we move this logic into a separate helper function? That would make things a little better organized and easier to test. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF: also decode time bounds when available 384004189 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1