issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 367258270 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

issue 1

  • Update whats-new.rst · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
427538964 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2466#issuecomment-427538964 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2466 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNzUzODk2NA== shoyer 1217238 2018-10-06T02:24:11Z 2018-10-06T02:24:11Z MEMBER

This is fine. "stable" is just the branch used for building our docs, which generally points to the last release + cherrypicks. We should also fix this on "master" but it isn't urgent and I'm not worried about duplicating this work :). The releasing instructions explicitly note that it's OK to force push to stable when releasing a new version.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Update whats-new.rst 367258270
427536635 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2466#issuecomment-427536635 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2466 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNzUzNjYzNQ== max-sixty 5635139 2018-10-06T01:41:13Z 2018-10-06T01:41:13Z MEMBER

@pydata/xarray This was requested to merge into stable.

Is that OK? I'm not sure how the master & stable branches interact.

Let me know if there are any follow-ups (e.g. merge this into master). I'll check this PR tonight and this weekend.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Update whats-new.rst 367258270
427407462 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2466#issuecomment-427407462 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2466 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNzQwNzQ2Mg== max-sixty 5635139 2018-10-05T15:36:06Z 2018-10-05T15:36:06Z MEMBER

Thanks @jchenzhong !

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Update whats-new.rst 367258270

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);