issue_comments
1 row where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 351000813 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Inconsistent results when calculating sums on float32 arrays w/ bottleneck installed · 1 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
413775977 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2370#issuecomment-413775977 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2370 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxMzc3NTk3Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-08-17T06:58:21Z | 2018-08-17T06:58:21Z | MEMBER | There has been discussion about changing this condo-forge dependencies for xarray: https://github.com/conda-forge/xarray-feedstock/issues/5. Bottleneck definitely isn’t a true required dependency. Does it work to simply specify an explicit dtype in the sum? I also wonder if it’s really worth the hassle of using bottleneck here, given these numerical precision issues and how it can’t be used with cask. But I do think it still probably offers a meaningful speedup in many cases.... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Inconsistent results when calculating sums on float32 arrays w/ bottleneck installed 351000813 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1