issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 324105458 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- ENH: Plotting for groupby_bins · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
432145295 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2152#issuecomment-432145295 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2152 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjE0NTI5NQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-10-23T08:19:46Z | 2018-10-23T08:19:46Z | MEMBER | Failed test is cfgrib test. Thanks @maahn |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Plotting for groupby_bins 324105458 | |
428458765 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2152#issuecomment-428458765 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2152 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyODQ1ODc2NQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2018-10-10T06:54:07Z | 2018-10-10T06:54:07Z | MEMBER | Really sorry for the delay, @maahn. I've merged master, refactored out the utility functions to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Plotting for groupby_bins 324105458 | |
393211218 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2152#issuecomment-393211218 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2152 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MzIxMTIxOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-05-30T15:42:39Z | 2018-05-30T15:42:39Z | MEMBER | Rather than using I'm not sure that a step plot would be preferred by most users for a plot over an axis on which groupby_bins was applied. Personally, I would probably prefer a line + scatter plot (e.g., |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Plotting for groupby_bins 324105458 | |
391413132 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2152#issuecomment-391413132 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2152 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MTQxMzEzMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-05-23T16:31:07Z | 2018-05-23T16:31:07Z | MEMBER | A couple of other thoughts:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Plotting for groupby_bins 324105458 | |
389939666 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2152#issuecomment-389939666 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2152 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4OTkzOTY2Ng== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-05-17T17:07:21Z | 2018-05-17T17:07:21Z | MEMBER | This seems like a good idea.
I wonder if it's worth just making this behavior the default, or generating an additional coordinate for the bin centers automatically. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Plotting for groupby_bins 324105458 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3