issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 322591813 and user = 6628425 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- cftime.datetime serialization example failing in latest doc build · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
388907899 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2127#issuecomment-388907899 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2127 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODkwNzg5OQ== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2018-05-14T17:59:56Z | 2018-05-14T17:59:56Z | MEMBER | Awesome, thanks for tracking that down in NumPy so quickly! I updated #2128 accordingly. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cftime.datetime serialization example failing in latest doc build 322591813 | |
388847354 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2127#issuecomment-388847354 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2127 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODg0NzM1NA== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2018-05-14T14:56:46Z | 2018-05-14T14:56:46Z | MEMBER | Huh...my test is still triggering some failures due to this issue in #2128. Oddly on my laptop the original bug doesn't appear to exist if I use python version 3.6.5 and numpy version 1.14.3 (the versions on Travis where I'm getting a failure): ``` $ python Python 3.6.5 | packaged by conda-forge | (default, Apr 6 2018, 13:44:09) [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
test_coding_times.py::test_infer_cftime_datetime_units PASSED [100%]
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cftime.datetime serialization example failing in latest doc build 322591813 | |
388817354 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2127#issuecomment-388817354 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2127 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODgxNzM1NA== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2018-05-14T13:31:56Z | 2018-05-14T13:31:56Z | MEMBER |
Interesting, thanks for investigating things further and confirming that it likely is a NumPy bug. I put up a fix following your suggestion in #2128 and also included a test. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cftime.datetime serialization example failing in latest doc build 322591813 | |
388662640 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2127#issuecomment-388662640 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2127 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODY2MjY0MA== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2018-05-13T23:07:15Z | 2018-05-13T23:07:15Z | MEMBER | It's confusing to me, because I don't see where NumPy is getting years or months metadata from the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cftime.datetime serialization example failing in latest doc build 322591813 | |
388661408 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2127#issuecomment-388661408 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2127 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4ODY2MTQwOA== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2018-05-13T22:42:57Z | 2018-05-13T22:42:57Z | MEMBER | With the specified |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
cftime.datetime serialization example failing in latest doc build 322591813 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1