issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 28297980 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Handle mask_and_scale ourselves instead of using netCDF4 · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
36299710 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/20#issuecomment-36299710 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/20 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Mjk5NzEw shoyer 1217238 2014-02-27T22:27:58Z 2014-02-27T22:27:58Z MEMBER

See the new commits for more comprehensive tests of encoding/decoding.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Handle mask_and_scale ourselves instead of using netCDF4 28297980
36286468 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/20#issuecomment-36286468 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/20 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2Mjg2NDY4 shoyer 1217238 2014-02-27T20:19:03Z 2014-02-27T20:19:03Z MEMBER

OK, the last commit implements the suggested approach in #26 and all tests pass.

There is not yet a test for toggling decode_mask_and_scale on/off when loading a dataset.

Please take a look when you get the chance :).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Handle mask_and_scale ourselves instead of using netCDF4 28297980
36216552 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/20#issuecomment-36216552 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/20 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MjE2NTUy shoyer 1217238 2014-02-27T07:10:03Z 2014-02-27T07:10:03Z MEMBER

Notes: 1. DO NOT MERGE -- some of the units tests are currently failing (see below). 2. I decided to rebase to use some of @ebrevdo's recent changes. The discussion on the previous commit can be found here: https://github.com/akleeman/xray/commit/d700eeb4da836cf300e92af6d9dcf17427d67e50

Failing tests:

I added an "encoded_dtype" attribute to keep of the original dtype of variables loaded from a netCDF file. Unfortunately, this means most of the round-trip tests currently fail, because no variables have "encoded_dtype" attributes until they are loaded from netCDF files. I think we will need to make some ugly trade-off to get round tripping working both directions, but I'm not yet sure what the best option is. We could: 1. Ignore some specific attributes (like "encoded_dtype") when checking XArray equality. 2. Save these encoding details on XArrays outside of the attributes dict. 3. Add special logic for the round-trip tests to ignore these attributes.

FWIW, I think it's OK if we don't preserve data types in the round-trip process, as long as the data itself is equivalent. I'm not entirely opposed to trying, but in general it is very hard to guarantee that serialized/unserialized data is exactly equivalent. There is somewhat of a conflict between preserving the original data (netCDF-like) and representing the data in a sane format in-memory (which should not be exactly like a netCDF). IMHO, we should focus on the later.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Handle mask_and_scale ourselves instead of using netCDF4 28297980

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);