issue_comments
6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 282178751 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
367806166 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1784#issuecomment-367806166 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzgwNjE2Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-22T20:08:46Z | 2018-02-22T20:08:46Z | MEMBER |
Currently, In either case I think it could make sense to optionally replace the return value with a dask delayed object, which in turn evaluates to either |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions 282178751 | |
367166682 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1784#issuecomment-367166682 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzE2NjY4Mg== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-21T00:10:04Z | 2018-02-21T00:10:04Z | MEMBER |
If
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware of that distinction but it does make sense.
A Another way to do this would be to have user code interact with the sync method directly: ```Python store = ds.to_netcdf('file.nc', sync=False) store.sync calls store.writer.sync() which calls dask.array.syncdelayed_things = store.sync(compute=False) ``` This has the advantage of keeping the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions 282178751 | |
367163589 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1784#issuecomment-367163589 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzE2MzU4OQ== | mrocklin 306380 | 2018-02-20T23:55:25Z | 2018-02-20T23:55:25Z | MEMBER | The term future, when used in a Dask context, generally refers to something that is off computing asynchronously somewhere, rather than a token that holds onto a yet-to-be-submitted lazy graph. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions 282178751 | |
367163456 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1784#issuecomment-367163456 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzE2MzQ1Ng== | mrocklin 306380 | 2018-02-20T23:54:46Z | 2018-02-20T23:54:46Z | MEMBER | What does |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions 282178751 | |
367162456 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1784#issuecomment-367162456 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NzE2MjQ1Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-20T23:49:41Z | 2018-02-20T23:49:41Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - Do you have thoughts on how this feature would present to the user? In #1811, I have added the ```Python store = ds.to_netcdf('file.nc', compute=False) dask.compute(store.futures) ``` Before I spend too much time on #1811, I want to get some buy in on the API for this feature. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions 282178751 | |
351785902 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1784#issuecomment-351785902 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1MTc4NTkwMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-14T17:48:48Z | 2017-12-14T17:48:48Z | MEMBER | Yes, this sounds like a natural improvement to me! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add compute=False keywords to `to_foo` functions 282178751 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3