issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 262930380 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
issue 1
- fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
339198772 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-339198772 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzOTE5ODc3Mg== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-25T02:56:55Z | 2017-10-25T02:56:55Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - take another look. I have basically merged our two ideas and refactored the roundtrip tests. Tests are still failing but not for py2.7, on appveyor, or py3.6 locally. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
339005604 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-339005604 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzOTAwNTYwNA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-24T14:17:27Z | 2017-10-24T14:17:27Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - ready for final review. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
338363428 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-338363428 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzODM2MzQyOA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-21T04:35:55Z | 2017-10-21T04:35:55Z | MEMBER | Question for those who are familiar with the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
337754946 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-337754946 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNzc1NDk0Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-18T23:17:48Z | 2017-10-18T23:17:48Z | MEMBER | @fmaussion - I've updated the append logic slightly. I'm wondering what you think? This version more aggressively overwrites existing variables (data_vars and coords). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
335518624 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-335518624 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNTUxODYyNA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-10T15:50:09Z | 2017-10-10T15:50:09Z | MEMBER | @fmaussion - you bring up a good point. There are two scenarios here. 1) appending to a file with existing data variables 2) appending to a file with existing coordinate variables I'm wondering if we should disallow 1, in favor of being more explicit. So: ```Python list_of_vars_to_append = ['var1', 'var2'] ds[list_of_vars_to_append].to_netcdf(filename, mode='a') if either var1 or var2 are in filename, raise an error?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1