issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 262930380 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
issue 1
- fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 339198772 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-339198772 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzOTE5ODc3Mg== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-25T02:56:55Z | 2017-10-25T02:56:55Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - take another look. I have basically merged our two ideas and refactored the roundtrip tests. Tests are still failing but not for py2.7, on appveyor, or py3.6 locally. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
| 339005604 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-339005604 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzOTAwNTYwNA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-24T14:17:27Z | 2017-10-24T14:17:27Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - ready for final review. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
| 338363428 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-338363428 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzODM2MzQyOA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-21T04:35:55Z | 2017-10-21T04:35:55Z | MEMBER | Question for those who are familiar with the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
| 337754946 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-337754946 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNzc1NDk0Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-18T23:17:48Z | 2017-10-18T23:17:48Z | MEMBER | @fmaussion - I've updated the append logic slightly. I'm wondering what you think? This version more aggressively overwrites existing variables (data_vars and coords). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 | |
| 335518624 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1609#issuecomment-335518624 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1609 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNTUxODYyNA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-10T15:50:09Z | 2017-10-10T15:50:09Z | MEMBER | @fmaussion - you bring up a good point. There are two scenarios here. 1) appending to a file with existing data variables 2) appending to a file with existing coordinate variables I'm wondering if we should disallow 1, in favor of being more explicit. So: ```Python list_of_vars_to_append = ['var1', 'var2'] ds[list_of_vars_to_append].to_netcdf(filename, mode='a') if either var1 or var2 are in filename, raise an error?
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fix to_netcdf append bug (GH1215) 262930380 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1