issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 243927150 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Excessive memory usage when printing multi-file Dataset · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
331539708 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1481#issuecomment-331539708 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1481 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzMTUzOTcwOA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-09-22T19:30:00Z | 2017-09-22T19:30:00Z | MEMBER | @hadfieldnz - I think this was just fixed in #1532. Keep an eye out for the 0.10 release. Feel free to reopen if you feel there's more to do here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Excessive memory usage when printing multi-file Dataset 243927150 | |
317050127 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1481#issuecomment-317050127 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1481 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNzA1MDEyNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-07-21T16:40:19Z | 2017-07-21T16:40:19Z | MEMBER | Our formatting logic pulls out the first few values of arrays to print them in the repr. It appears that this is failing spectacularly in this case, though I'm not sure why. Can you share a quick preview of what a single one of your constituent netCDF files looks like? More broadly: maybe we should disable automatically printing a preview of the contents of |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Excessive memory usage when printing multi-file Dataset 243927150 | |
316989732 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1481#issuecomment-316989732 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1481 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNjk4OTczMg== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-07-21T12:37:11Z | 2017-07-21T12:37:21Z | MEMBER | Can you try calling |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Excessive memory usage when printing multi-file Dataset 243927150 | |
316937056 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1481#issuecomment-316937056 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1481 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNjkzNzA1Ng== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-07-21T08:18:52Z | 2017-07-21T08:18:52Z | MEMBER | 0.14.3 pre-dates the fix https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/2364 mentioned above: can you try to update dask? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Excessive memory usage when printing multi-file Dataset 243927150 | |
316806744 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1481#issuecomment-316806744 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1481 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNjgwNjc0NA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-07-20T19:32:18Z | 2017-07-20T19:32:18Z | MEMBER | Hi @hadfieldnz -- I believe this issue could be related to #1396, which was fixed in dask/dask#2364. Could you let us know what versions of xarray and dask you are using?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Excessive memory usage when printing multi-file Dataset 243927150 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4