issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 241290234 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- sharing dimensions across dataarrays in a dataset · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
431051341 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1471#issuecomment-431051341 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMTA1MTM0MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-10-18T15:21:24Z | 2018-10-18T15:21:24Z | MEMBER | I'm marking #1408 as a bug so we won't forget about it. Hopefully it should be fixed automatically as part of the "explicit indexes" refactor. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 2:48 AM Ondrej Grover notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sharing dimensions across dataarrays in a dataset 241290234 | |
430358013 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1471#issuecomment-430358013 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMDM1ODAxMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-10-16T19:00:16Z | 2018-10-16T19:00:34Z | MEMBER | You can use a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sharing dimensions across dataarrays in a dataset 241290234 | |
313719395 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1471#issuecomment-313719395 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxMzcxOTM5NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-07-07T15:48:05Z | 2017-07-07T15:48:05Z | MEMBER | I'm afraid this isn't possible, by design. Every variable in a Dataset sharing the same coordinate system is enforced as part of the xarray data model. This makes data analysis and comparison with a Dataset quite straightforward, since everything is already on the same grid. For cases where you need different coordinate values and/or dimension sizes, your options are to either rename dimensions for different variables or use multiple Dataset/DataArray objects (Python has nice built-in data structures). In theory, we could add something like an "UnalignedDataset" that supports most of the Dataset methods without requiring alignment but I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
sharing dimensions across dataarrays in a dataset 241290234 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1