issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 231308952 and user = 10050469 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • fmaussion · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • scalar_level in MultiIndex · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
304904137 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1426#issuecomment-304904137 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1426 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNDkwNDEzNw== fmaussion 10050469 2017-05-30T14:53:48Z 2017-05-30T14:53:48Z MEMBER

It occurs to me that if we had full support for indexing on coordinate levels, we might not need a notion of a "MultiIndex" in the public API at all.

This would be awesome and so much clearer for many users including me, who understand "coordinates" much better than "MultiIndex".

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   scalar_level in MultiIndex 231308952

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);