issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 186169975 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
These facets timed out: author_association, issue
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
327252508 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-327252508 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNzI1MjUwOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-09-05T17:46:54Z | 2017-09-05T17:47:19Z | MEMBER | @mrpgraae no, I don't think this has been implemented yet. Please take a look at #1508 for an example of the model to use:
- Define an You are also welcome to add any keyword parameters (e.g., So the user API becomes:
|
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
305946578 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-305946578 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTk0NjU3OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-06-03T03:04:13Z | 2017-06-03T03:04:13Z | MEMBER | Nevermind, I figured it out (I was using an old version of pydap by mistake). See #1439 for the pydap fix. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
305830027 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-305830027 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTgzMDAyNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-06-02T15:54:23Z | 2017-06-02T15:54:23Z | MEMBER | I spent a few minutes on this but am still getting |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
290879727 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-290879727 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MDg3OTcyNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-04-01T00:42:35Z | 2017-04-01T00:42:35Z | MEMBER |
Indeed, it would be great if someone using pydap could take a look into this. You can find our logic for interoperating with pydap here: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/xarray/backends/pydap_.py |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
288950068 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-288950068 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4ODk1MDA2OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-03-24T07:14:10Z | 2017-03-24T07:14:10Z | MEMBER | Pydap has a new v3.2 release, but it still needs some fixes to work with xarray -- or xarray needs to be updated to work with the new version of pydap. I think https://github.com/pydap/pydap/pull/48 once merged would probably be enough to restore xarray compatibility. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
288948872 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-288948872 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4ODk0ODg3Mg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-03-24T07:06:00Z | 2017-03-24T07:06:00Z | MEMBER | Parsing username/password from the URL would be very easy to add. We need to figure out a solution for the proliferating arguments on Another option is to add |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
257485973 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-257485973 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NzQ4NTk3Mw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-01T04:24:40Z | 2016-11-01T04:24:40Z | MEMBER | If the dataset has a "time" dimension, try accessing the first few values. Can you view them in pydap? Xarray's open_dataset does a little more work than pydap's open_url, insofar as it actually downloads some array data. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 | |
257321771 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1068#issuecomment-257321771 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1068 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NzMyMTc3MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-10-31T15:16:14Z | 2016-10-31T15:16:14Z | MEMBER | If you write |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use xarray.open_dataset() for password-protected Opendap files 186169975 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1