issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 158902764 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- ENH: more control on colorbar · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
224931775 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/872#issuecomment-224931775 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/872 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNDkzMTc3NQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2016-06-09T15:28:14Z | 2016-06-09T15:28:14Z | MEMBER | No need to rebase. We can squash on the github side now. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: more control on colorbar 158902764 | |
224806584 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/872#issuecomment-224806584 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/872 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNDgwNjU4NA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2016-06-09T05:55:54Z | 2016-06-09T05:55:54Z | MEMBER | This is great. I had two small comments and agree that it could use some tests. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: more control on colorbar 158902764 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1