issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 158412366 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- BUG: contour plot levels · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
233895323 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/868#issuecomment-233895323 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/868 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIzMzg5NTMyMw== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-07-20T09:11:36Z | 2016-07-20T09:11:36Z | MEMBER | @shoyer yes, this was my original idea too: I think it's better now, let me know what you think. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
BUG: contour plot levels 158412366 | |
233507801 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/868#issuecomment-233507801 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/868 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIzMzUwNzgwMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-07-19T01:40:24Z | 2016-07-19T01:40:24Z | MEMBER | I wonder -- would it maybe make more sense to simply not to add a colorbar by default? It's pretty easy to toggle if desired. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
BUG: contour plot levels 158412366 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2