issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 1563270549 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Update contains_cftime_datetimes to avoid loading entire variable array · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1456506306 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7494#issuecomment-1456506306 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7494 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85W0IXC | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-06T16:52:13Z | 2023-03-06T16:52:13Z | MEMBER | Thanks @agoodm this work prompted a bunch of internal cleanup! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Update contains_cftime_datetimes to avoid loading entire variable array 1563270549 | |
| 1450003953 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7494#issuecomment-1450003953 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7494 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85WbU3x | mathause 10194086 | 2023-03-01T11:55:41Z | 2023-03-01T11:55:41Z | MEMBER | I think that's in the tests themselves |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Update contains_cftime_datetimes to avoid loading entire variable array 1563270549 | |
| 1449323880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7494#issuecomment-1449323880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7494 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85WYu1o | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-01T04:30:54Z | 2023-03-01T04:30:54Z | MEMBER | Seems like we're passing a DataArray instead of a Variable somewhere. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Update contains_cftime_datetimes to avoid loading entire variable array 1563270549 | |
| 1411177667 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7494#issuecomment-1411177667 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7494 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UHNzD | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-31T22:49:24Z | 2023-01-31T22:49:24Z | MEMBER | @agoodm, what you think of this version? Using xr.Variable directly seems a little easier to work with than trying to guess which type of array (cupy, dask, pint, backendarray, etc) is in the variable. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Update contains_cftime_datetimes to avoid loading entire variable array 1563270549 | |
| 1410233955 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7494#issuecomment-1410233955 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7494 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UDnZj | mathause 10194086 | 2023-01-31T12:06:00Z | 2023-01-31T12:06:00Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the PR. However, does that actually make a difference? To me it looks like |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Update contains_cftime_datetimes to avoid loading entire variable array 1563270549 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3