issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 1510151748 and user = 10194086 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Allow passing figure handle to FacetGrid · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1366550470 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7401#issuecomment-1366550470 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7401 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Rc-fG | mathause 10194086 | 2022-12-28T10:36:03Z | 2022-12-28T10:36:03Z | MEMBER | Good point. Combining two
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow passing figure handle to FacetGrid 1510151748 | |
1364669991 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7401#issuecomment-1364669991 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7401 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RVzYn | mathause 10194086 | 2022-12-25T12:01:27Z | 2022-12-25T12:01:27Z | MEMBER | I think the usual workflow is to create the figure with gridspec and then update the created subplots and figure. Is there something that is not possible if done this way around? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow passing figure handle to FacetGrid 1510151748 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1