issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 1357296406 and user = 4160723 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date)
issue 1
- Add set_xindex and drop_indexes methods · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1259349072 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6971#issuecomment-1259349072 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6971 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LECRQ | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-09-27T11:14:07Z | 2022-09-27T11:14:07Z | MEMBER | In the last commit I added the Thanks everyone for the feedback and review! I think this is ready to merge, if we agree to address the |
{
"total_count": 4,
"+1": 4,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add set_xindex and drop_indexes methods 1357296406 | |
| 1246569430 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6971#issuecomment-1246569430 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6971 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KTSPW | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-09-14T10:33:17Z | 2022-09-14T10:33:17Z | MEMBER |
Yes I've been thinking about it and I agree I find it cleaner than exposing all of this in Xarray's main namespace. There's a few (minor) cons, though:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add set_xindex and drop_indexes methods 1357296406 | |
| 1239114118 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6971#issuecomment-1239114118 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6971 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85J22GG | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-09-07T09:03:46Z | 2022-09-07T09:03:46Z | MEMBER |
I ended up doing it. It is convenient for setting a pandas index for a non-dimension coordinate, which is currently not possible to do with |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add set_xindex and drop_indexes methods 1357296406 | |
| 1232960157 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6971#issuecomment-1232960157 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6971 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85JfXqd | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-08-31T13:45:26Z | 2022-08-31T13:45:26Z | MEMBER | BTW, viewing pull-request doc builds on RTD seems broken? Clicking on the "Details" link of the corresponding check leads to a 404. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add set_xindex and drop_indexes methods 1357296406 | |
| 1232946098 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6971#issuecomment-1232946098 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6971 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85JfUOy | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-08-31T13:33:42Z | 2022-08-31T13:34:36Z | MEMBER | Also, since |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add set_xindex and drop_indexes methods 1357296406 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1