issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 1325665237 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Confusing terminologies and some errors in the official documentation · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1202813916 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6866#issuecomment-1202813916 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6866 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85HsXvc | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-08-02T15:23:34Z | 2022-08-02T15:23:34Z | MEMBER | Yes, performing selection using coordinate labels (i.e., Before v2022.6.0, only 1-dimensional coordinates with the name matching the dimension name could have a pandas index or multi-index. Hence the distinction between a "dimension coordinate" which most often implicitly wrapped a pandas index and a "non-dimension" coordinate for which label-based selection was impossible. Starting from v2022.6.0, this constraint is relaxed. Although it is not yet fully operational, any coordinate or any group of coordinates (with arbitrary dimensions) may now have an index (either pandas-based or any xarray compatible custom index) and may therefore be used for label-based selection (if the index supports it). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Confusing terminologies and some errors in the official documentation 1325665237 | |
1202597691 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6866#issuecomment-1202597691 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6866 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Hri87 | benbovy 4160723 | 2022-08-02T13:43:52Z | 2022-08-02T13:43:52Z | MEMBER | Hi @v-liuwei, thanks for the report. The issues that your are pointing are part of #6293. There has been many internal changes (+ some subtle public-facing changes) regarding indexes in the last release, but there is still some work for reflecting it in the documentation.
I agree, this has always been a source of confusion IMO. Xarray's data model has been updated in the last release such that these two concepts are now different and independent (i.e., it allows a non-dimension coordinate to have an index).
This is because multi-index levels now have each their own, real coordinate (the documentation is not yet up-to-date). However, I agree that using the same symbol for multi-coordinate indexes may not be ideal as it is hard to distinguish which coordinate is associated with which index. On the other hand, using two different symbols wouldn't be an elegant solution either if we later depreciate the multi-index dimension coordinate (i.e., |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Confusing terminologies and some errors in the official documentation 1325665237 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1