home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 128903340 and user = 1839645 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • choldgraf · 5 ✖

issue 1

  • DataArray creation prone to errors when data shares dimension shapes · 5 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 5 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
244228425 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-244228425 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/727 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0NDIyODQyNQ== choldgraf 1839645 2016-09-01T22:10:56Z 2016-09-01T22:10:56Z MEMBER

whoops - that's what I get for not putting this on my to-do list...totally forgot about this issue. My bad, but thanks for fixing!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  DataArray creation prone to errors when data shares dimension shapes 128903340
175758184 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175758184 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/727 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NTc1ODE4NA== choldgraf 1839645 2016-01-27T17:31:12Z 2016-01-27T17:31:12Z MEMBER

Cool - I'll make a PR in the next week or two...I know this isn't a big change but have a few deadlines in the coming days.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  DataArray creation prone to errors when data shares dimension shapes 128903340
175742179 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175742179 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/727 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NTc0MjE3OQ== choldgraf 1839645 2016-01-27T16:56:51Z 2016-01-27T16:56:51Z MEMBER

So it looks like the relevant code is somewhere around here, no? Is "auto-coords" done in many other places in the codebase?

And as far as future behavior, do you imagine just changing the utils.is_dict_like bits so that instead of doing magical stuff under the hood, they just throw an error from now on?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  DataArray creation prone to errors when data shares dimension shapes 128903340
175417379 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175417379 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/727 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NTQxNzM3OQ== choldgraf 1839645 2016-01-27T05:53:02Z 2016-01-27T05:53:02Z MEMBER

Lemme take a look at the code tomorrow. I'm pretty new to xarray but I've been meaning to learn it a bit more :-) On Jan 26, 2016 9:51 PM, "Stephan Hoyer" notifications@github.com wrote:

Any interest in putting together a PR? :)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Chris Holdgraf notifications@github.com wrote:

That sounds like a fair plan to me - throwing errors etc definitely complicates things more than just deprecating the option :)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Joe Hamman notifications@github.com wrote:

So I would support deprecating supplying dict-like coordinates without explicitly provided dims. It's more magic than we really need. This line is in the relevant code path.

I've also run into this and I'm [image: :+1:] on this solution.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175399404.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175414737.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175415408.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  DataArray creation prone to errors when data shares dimension shapes 128903340
175414737 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175414737 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/727 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NTQxNDczNw== choldgraf 1839645 2016-01-27T05:46:36Z 2016-01-27T05:46:36Z MEMBER

That sounds like a fair plan to me - throwing errors etc definitely complicates things more than just deprecating the option :)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Joe Hamman notifications@github.com wrote:

So I would support deprecating supplying dict-like coordinates without explicitly provided dims. It's more magic than we really need. This line is in the relevant code path.

I've also run into this and I'm [image: :+1:] on this solution.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/727#issuecomment-175399404.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  DataArray creation prone to errors when data shares dimension shapes 128903340

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 3119.71ms · About: xarray-datasette