issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 125708367 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
723241066 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-723241066 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzI0MTA2Ng== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-11-06T18:47:35Z | 2020-11-06T18:48:54Z | MEMBER | true, it seems I didn't read this issue carefully enough |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
723239452 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-723239452 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzIzOTQ1Mg== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-11-06T18:44:07Z | 2020-11-06T18:44:07Z | MEMBER | 4515 is consistent with this comment up above:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
723193550 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-723193550 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMzE5MzU1MA== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-11-06T17:07:55Z | 2020-11-06T17:07:55Z | MEMBER | what should we do about this? We did touch the subject in #4409, but decided to keep the order the coordinates were passed in rather than sorting by dimension (or alphabetically). I think there's a lot of confusion about the difference between the dimensions in the summary line of A fix for #4515 might make sorting by dimension order much more important. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
458305117 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-458305117 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1ODMwNTExNw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-28T21:18:13Z | 2019-01-28T21:18:13Z | MEMBER | @anntzer - would you be interested in working on this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
211418692 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-211418692 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMTQxODY5Mg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-04-18T15:04:30Z | 2016-04-18T15:04:30Z | MEMBER | OK, I didn't read your first post carefully last time. Your complaint was about the order of coordinates in We could add some sort of ad-hoc adjustment to the order in which we display coordinates, but I'm reluctant because it's not obvious to me what that "correct" order would be. For example, that you can directly supply the I suppose once principled choice would always be to display coordinates corresponding to dimensions first in lists of coordinates, and to always display them in the same order as dimensions. If we do this, it should be consistent between both DataArray and Dataset. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
174843391 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-174843391 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NDg0MzM5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-01-26T05:41:28Z | 2016-01-26T05:41:28Z | MEMBER | This should be fixed in v0.7.0... please reopen if it resurfaces. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
170155759 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-170155759 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3MDE1NTc1OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-01-08T23:28:44Z | 2016-01-08T23:28:44Z | MEMBER | yes, in the next week, hopefully. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 | |
170149315 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-170149315 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3MDE0OTMxNQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-01-08T22:49:37Z | 2016-01-08T22:50:03Z | MEMBER | I think this may have been fixed by the recent rewrite of DataArray internals. On master, I have: ``` In [2]: d1 Out[2]: <xray.DataArray (foo: 2, bar: 2)> array([[ 0.00000000e+000, 0.00000000e+000], [ 2.15725662e-314, 2.15893204e-314]]) Coordinates: * foo (foo) int64 0 1 * bar (bar) int64 0 1 In [3]: d2 Out[3]: <xray.DataArray (bar: 2, foo: 2)> array([[ 0.00000000e+000, 0.00000000e+000], [ 2.15906985e-314, 2.14458868e-314]]) Coordinates: * bar (bar) int64 0 1 * foo (foo) int64 0 1 ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4