home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 124685682 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

  • jreback 1
  • shoyer 1
  • max-sixty 1

issue 1

  • BUG: not converting datetime64[ns] with tz from pandas.Series · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
168730777 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/701#issuecomment-168730777 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/701 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODczMDc3Nw== max-sixty 5635139 2016-01-04T16:48:44Z 2016-01-04T16:48:44Z MEMBER

@jreback

Yeah if you store things as Index objects, then this would go away.

@shoyer remains unconvinced, and I defer to him without reservation - but if you think this would make sense, say so

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  BUG: not converting datetime64[ns] with tz from pandas.Series 124685682
168675157 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/701#issuecomment-168675157 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/701 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODY3NTE1Nw== jreback 953992 2016-01-04T13:21:16Z 2016-01-04T13:21:16Z MEMBER

yeh, this is fine. maybe just note which dtypes are lossless and which are not. Yeah if you store things as Index objects, then this would go away.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  BUG: not converting datetime64[ns] with tz from pandas.Series 124685682
168588381 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/701#issuecomment-168588381 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/701 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODU4ODM4MQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-01-04T05:54:25Z 2016-01-04T05:54:25Z MEMBER

This is difficult to do properly, because xray uses numpy or dask.array to store array data, and datetime64 with a timezone is not a real numpy dtype.

I guess the right solution (similar to what I did for PeriodIndex in #692) would be to convert to dtype=object when necessary. Is there an easy way to get this from pandas?

Although, I do think it's pretty consistent that we use the result of np.asarray(s) as the values in xray. The timezone info is thrown away when you call this.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  BUG: not converting datetime64[ns] with tz from pandas.Series 124685682

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 88.63ms · About: xarray-datasette