issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 114773593 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Feature request: only allow nearest-neighbor .sel for valid data (not NaN positions) · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1150280375 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/644#issuecomment-1150280375 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/644 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ej-K3 | shoyer 1217238 | 2022-06-08T18:56:17Z | 2022-06-08T18:56:17Z | MEMBER | This might fit more naturally into interp() as a new method like "nearest-valid" rather than in sel(). The difference is that sel() only looks at indexes (and not the data) to select out a single value, whereas interp() can combine adjacent values in arbitrary ways. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request: only allow nearest-neighbor .sel for valid data (not NaN positions) 114773593 | |
| 721440664 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/644#issuecomment-721440664 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/644 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMTQ0MDY2NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-11-04T00:10:41Z | 2020-11-04T00:10:41Z | MEMBER | There hasn't been any progress on this to my knowledge, unfortunately |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request: only allow nearest-neighbor .sel for valid data (not NaN positions) 114773593 | |
| 155611625 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/644#issuecomment-155611625 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/644 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NTYxMTYyNQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-11-11T00:27:10Z | 2015-11-11T00:27:10Z | MEMBER | This is tricky to put into One way to fix this would be to unravel your two dimensions corresponding to latitude and longitude into a single "lat_lon" dimension. At this point, you could apply a sea mask, to produce a compressed lat_lon coordinate corresponding to only unmasked points. Now, it's relatively straightforward to imagine doing nearest neighbor lookups on this set of labels. This later solution will require a few steps (all of which are on the "to do" list, but without any immediate timelines): 1. support for multi-level indexes in xray 2. support for "unraveling" multiple dimensions into 1-dimension 3. support for looking up nearest locations in multiple dimensions via some sort of spatial index (e.g., a KD tree) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request: only allow nearest-neighbor .sel for valid data (not NaN positions) 114773593 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1