issue_comments
14 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 1118113789 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' · 14 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1026327684 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1026327684 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849LISE | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-01-31T23:51:54Z | 2022-01-31T23:51:54Z | MEMBER | I'll merge now though do the release this eve |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 3, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1026306642 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1026306642 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849LDJS | jhamman 2443309 | 2022-01-31T23:16:11Z | 2022-01-31T23:16:11Z | MEMBER | This is ready to merge. @max-sixty - whenever you are ready, go ahead and merge and make the release. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1025992494 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1025992494 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849J2cu | jhamman 2443309 | 2022-01-31T16:54:46Z | 2022-01-31T16:58:13Z | MEMBER | @pydata/xarray - we should try to get this merged and a new release up ASAP as bug reports are starting to pile up. I've pushed changes to the CI configs, documentation, and elsewhere. I've also pulled in the recent changes on Also, thanks @s-weigand for opening this PR and raising the issue. |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1025994647 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1025994647 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849J2-X | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-01-31T16:57:00Z | 2022-01-31T16:57:00Z | MEMBER | I can do the release later today if no one gets there first |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 1, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1025230165 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1025230165 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849G8VV | keewis 14808389 | 2022-01-30T21:01:12Z | 2022-01-30T21:05:48Z | MEMBER | other than the environment files and the asv config we also need to update |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1025228982 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1025228982 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849G8C2 | keewis 14808389 | 2022-01-30T20:54:39Z | 2022-01-30T20:54:39Z | MEMBER | just for the record, we decided that packaging related tools (i.e. |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1025200701 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1025200701 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849G1I9 | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-01-30T18:23:53Z | 2022-01-30T18:23:53Z | MEMBER | Following dask seems like a good idea! We probably should add packaging in our ci installs as well: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/tree/main/ci/requirements and the asv config: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/main/asv_bench/asv.conf.json |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024993880 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024993880 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849GCpY | keewis 14808389 | 2022-01-29T21:55:50Z | 2022-01-29T21:55:50Z | MEMBER | no, I think we should still add |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024956677 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024956677 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849F5kF | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-01-29T17:50:02Z | 2022-01-29T17:50:02Z | MEMBER | Thanks everyone! Are we ok to close this then? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024896079 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024896079 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849FqxP | mathause 10194086 | 2022-01-29T11:47:42Z | 2022-01-29T11:47:42Z | MEMBER | Yes, I think I just expressed it wrong. What I wanted to say: zhe failure you see here is not caused by #6200 but by a new release of dask. And this is independent of your issue with packaging. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024896045 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024896045 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849Fqwt | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-01-29T11:47:29Z | 2022-01-29T11:47:29Z | MEMBER | https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.10.html#distutils-deprecated recommends importing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024884846 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024884846 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849FoBu | mathause 10194086 | 2022-01-29T10:30:23Z | 2022-01-29T10:55:14Z | MEMBER | Thanks. I think it makes sense to revert #6200 then, it's not critical. I opened #6208 for this. Thanks for the report and the PR. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024887103 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024887103 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849Fok_ | mathause 10194086 | 2022-01-29T10:46:12Z | 2022-01-29T10:46:12Z | MEMBER | On second thought I think the problem is the release of dask 2022.01.1. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 | |
1024884870 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6207#issuecomment-1024884870 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6207 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849FoCG | mathause 10194086 | 2022-01-29T10:30:38Z | 2022-01-29T10:30:38Z | MEMBER | cc @pydata/xarray |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix missing dependecy definition of 'packaging' 1118113789 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5